On Wednesday 9 October 2019 11:46:08 CEST Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The memset appears to have the 2nd and 3rd arguments in the wrong
> order, fix this by swapping these around into the correct order.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Memset fill truncated")
> Fixes: 4f8b7fabb15d ("staging: wfx: allow to send commands to chip")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wfx/debug.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/debug.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/debug.c
> index 8de16ad7c710..761ad9b4f27e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/debug.c
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static ssize_t wfx_send_hif_msg_write(struct file *file, const char __user *user
> // wfx_cmd_send() chekc that reply buffer is wide enough, but do not
> // return precise length read. User have to know how many bytes should
> // be read. Filling reply buffer with a memory pattern may help user.
> - memset(context->reply, sizeof(context->reply), 0xFF);
> + memset(context->reply, 0xFF, sizeof(context->reply));
> request = memdup_user(user_buf, count);
> if (IS_ERR(request))
> return PTR_ERR(request);
Ouch! I realize that "-Wmemset-transposed-args" and/or "-Wmemset-elt-size"
don't catch this case.
Thank you for your attentive reading.
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Jérôme Pouiller
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
