On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 05:25:17PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 3:16 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > The subject doesn't match the patch. It should just be "remove useless > > > printk". > > > > > > regards, > > > dan carpenter > > > > > > > Well, it avoids leaking an address by removing an useless printk. > > It seems that GKH already picked the patch in his staging tree, but > > I'm fine with both subjects, really, > > The address wasn't leaked because it was already %pK. The subject > says there is an info leak security problem, when the opposite is true. I've edited the subject line now. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
