On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:01:35PM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> We've seen several incorrect patches for fs_sync() calls in the exfat driver.
> Add code to the TODO that explains this isn't just a delete code and refactor,
> but that actual analysis of when the filesystem should be flushed to disk
> needs to be done.
>
This doesn't help at all because no one can be expected to read it.
Put a comment in the code which says something like:
diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c
index 229ecabe7a93..c1710d99875e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c
@@ -287,6 +287,13 @@ static DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(z_sem);
static inline void fs_sync(struct super_block *sb, bool do_sync)
{
+ /*
+ * Oct 2019: Please, do not delete this code or the callers. This
+ * code is obviously bogus and many of the callers are dead code, yes,
+ * but it may hold clues as to when syncing is required. Someone needs
+ * to go through and audit it really carefully.
+ *
+ */
if (do_sync)
bdev_sync(sb);
}
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
