On 9/23/19 2:48 PM, Connor Kuehl wrote:
The local variable 'bcmd_down' is always set to true almost immediately
before the do-while's condition is checked. As a result, !bcmd_down
evaluates to false which short circuits the logical AND operator meaning
that the second operand is never reached and is therefore dead code.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_cmd.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_cmd.c
index 47352f210c0b..a4b317937b23 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_cmd.c
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ static u8 _is_fw_read_cmd_down(struct adapter *adapt, u8 msgbox_num)
static s32 FillH2CCmd_88E(struct adapter *adapt, u8 ElementID, u32 CmdLen, u8 *pCmdBuffer)
{
u8 bcmd_down = false;
- s32 retry_cnts = 100;
u8 h2c_box_num;
u32 msgbox_addr;
u32 msgbox_ex_addr;
@@ -103,7 +102,7 @@ static s32 FillH2CCmd_88E(struct adapter *adapt, u8 ElementID, u32 CmdLen, u8 *p
adapt->HalData->LastHMEBoxNum =
(h2c_box_num+1) % RTL88E_MAX_H2C_BOX_NUMS;
- } while ((!bcmd_down) && (retry_cnts--));
+ } while (!bcmd_down);
ret = _SUCCESS;
This patch is correct; however, the do..while loop will always be executed once,
thus you could remove the loop and the loop variable bcmd_down.
@greg: If you would prefer a two-step process, then this one is OK.
Larry
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
