On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 05:35:37PM +0000, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> Use timestamp_t for everything and cleanup duplicate code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Vidic <vvidic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/exfat/exfat.h | 35 +++---
> drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c | 158 ++++++++--------------------
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat.h b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat.h
> index 0aa14dea4e09..58e1e889779f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat.h
> @@ -241,16 +241,6 @@ static inline u16 get_row_index(u16 i)
> #define UNI_PAR_DIR_NAME "\0.\0."
> #endif
>
> -struct date_time_t {
> - u16 Year;
> - u16 Month;
> - u16 Day;
> - u16 Hour;
> - u16 Minute;
> - u16 Second;
> - u16 MilliSecond;
> -};
> -
> struct part_info_t {
> u32 Offset; /* start sector number of the partition */
> u32 Size; /* in sectors */
> @@ -289,6 +279,16 @@ struct file_id_t {
> u32 hint_last_clu;
> };
>
> +struct timestamp_t {
> + u16 millisec; /* 0 ~ 999 */
You added this field to this structure, why? You did not document that
in the changelog text above. Are you _sure_ you can do this and that
this does not refer to an on-disk layout?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
