On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:12 AM Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 04:49:03PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:20:32AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > On September 4, 2019 7:19:35 AM EDT, Christian Brauner > > > <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:16:51AM -0700, Hridya Valsaraju wrote: > > > >> Currently, the only way to access binder state and > > > >> statistics is through debugfs. We need a way to > > > >> access the same even when debugfs is not mounted. > > > >> These patches add a mount option to make this > > > >> information available in binderfs without affecting > > > >> its presence in debugfs. The following debugfs nodes > > > >> will be made available in a binderfs instance when > > > >> mounted with the mount option 'stats=global' or 'stats=local'. > > > >> > > > >> /sys/kernel/debug/binder/failed_transaction_log > > > >> /sys/kernel/debug/binder/proc > > > >> /sys/kernel/debug/binder/state > > > >> /sys/kernel/debug/binder/stats > > > >> /sys/kernel/debug/binder/transaction_log > > > >> /sys/kernel/debug/binder/transactions > > > > > > > >Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > >Btw, I think your counting is off-by-one. :) We usually count the > > > >initial send of a series as 0 and the first rework of that series as > > > >v1. > > > >I think you counted your initial send as v1 and the first rework as v2. > > > > > > Which is fine. I have done it both ways. Is this a rule written somewhere? > > > > No where, I can count both ways, it's not a big deal :) > > It isn't documented (as many things we still do are) and it's not a big > deal. But most people seem to be counting revisions starting from 0 it > seems. I went looking for previous version to link to in the patch cover > letter and was confused because I was missing a v1. :) > > Anyway, I'm happy that Hridya landed this! It was fun helping her the > last couple of weeks on- and off-list. Thanks for getting this done! I > hope we'll see even more patches in the future. :) Thank you so much Christian and Todd for the guidance and thorough reviews on the many patches I sent your way both on and off-list :) I really appreciate it! > > Christian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
