On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:57:11AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > +config EROFS_FS_XATTR > > + bool "EROFS extended attributes" > > + depends on EROFS_FS > > + default y > > + help > > + Extended attributes are name:value pairs associated with inodes by > > + the kernel or by users (see the attr(5) manual page, or visit > > + <http://acl.bestbits.at/> for details). > > + > > + If unsure, say N. > > + > > +config EROFS_FS_POSIX_ACL > > + bool "EROFS Access Control Lists" > > + depends on EROFS_FS_XATTR > > + select FS_POSIX_ACL > > + default y > > Is there any good reason to make these optional these days? I objected against adding so many config options, not to say for the standard features. The various cache strategies or other implementation details have been removed but I agree that making xattr/acl configurable is not necessary as well. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
