On Thursday 29 August 2019 19:18:16 Valdis Klētnieks wrote: > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 22:56:31 +0200, Pali Roh?r said: > > > I'm not really sure if this exfat implementation is fully suitable for > > mainline linux kernel. > > > > In my opinion, proper way should be to implement exFAT support into > > existing fs/fat/ code instead of replacing whole vfat/msdosfs by this > > new (now staging) fat implementation. > > > In linux kernel we really do not need two different implementation of > > VFAT32. > > This patch however does have one major advantage over "patch vfat to > support exfat" - which is that the patch exists. I understand that this is advantage... > If somebody comes forward with an actual "extend vfat to do exfat" patch, > we should at that point have a discussion about relative merits.... ... but is this advantage such big that it should be merged even due to "horrible" code quality and lot of code/functionality duplication? In similar way there should be discussion about these pros and cons. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
