On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 09:12:51PM -0700, Edmund Huber wrote: > My apologies. Is it possible that you are replying to a different thread > than intended? I don't think I have an email addressed to me from the > patchbot. I got a bunch of patches from a lot of different people all at once (Tobin must have run a class), so yes, it is totally possible that I did not respond to yours, but someone elses, my appologies. Here's what it should have said, I'll run it "by hand" below: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:37 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:43:06PM +0000, me@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Edmund Huber <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_pcimio.c | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line. Please read the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches and resend it after adding that line. Note, the line needs to be in the body of the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the email signature. - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. - You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg, and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should look like. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
