On Thu 08-08-19 16:25:04, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> > I thought I'd caught things early enough to get away with the
> > rename and deletion of that. You could either:
> >
> > a) open code an implementation of vaddr_put_pages_dirty_lock() that
> > doesn't call any of the *put_user_pages_dirty*() variants, or
> >
> > b) include my first patch ("") are part of your series, or
> >
> > c) base this on Andrews's tree, which already has merged in my first patch.
> >
>
> Yep I can do this. I did not realize that Andrew had accepted any of
> this work. I'll check out his tree. But I don't think he is going to
> accept this series through his tree. So what is the ETA on that landing
> in Linus' tree?
>
> To that point I'm still not sure who would take all this as I am now
> touching mm, procfs, rdma, ext4, and xfs.
MM tree would be one candidate for routing but there are other options that
would make sense as well - Dan's tree, VFS tree, or even I can pickup the
patches to my tree if needed. But let's worry about the routing after we
have working and reviewed patches...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
