On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 13:23 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 04:15:44AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 11:41 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > Joe rightly points out that we should be using the "Obsolete" status for > > > > these two subsystems. > > > > > > Even with that change, I don't see get_maintainers.pl tell me I > > > shouldn't be sending a patch in for this area: > > > > Nor should you. It's checkpatch that should warn. > > Ah, wrong tool. Yes, it does, let's see if anyone actually notices that > when sending checkpatch changes for these files in the future :) Maybe mark the isdn block obsolete too. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2ecfbf8dda354fe47912446bf5c3fe30ca905aa0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
