On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:18 PM John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:36 PM Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/17/19 12:31 PM, Alexander Popov wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > The syzkaller [1] has a trouble with fuzzing the Linux kernel with ION Memory
> > > Allocator.
> > >
> > > Syzkaller uses several methods [2] to limit memory consumption of the userspace
> > > processes calling the syscalls for testing the kernel:
> > > - setrlimit(),
> > > - cgroups,
> > > - various sysctl.
> > > But these methods don't work for ION Memory Allocator, so any userspace process
> > > that has access to /dev/ion can bring the system to the out-of-memory state.
> > >
> > > An example of a program doing that:
> > >
> > >
> > > #include <sys/types.h>
> > > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > > #include <fcntl.h>
> > > #include <stdio.h>
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> > >
> > > #define ION_IOC_MAGIC 'I'
> > > #define ION_IOC_ALLOC _IOWR(ION_IOC_MAGIC, 0, \
> > > struct ion_allocation_data)
> > >
> > > struct ion_allocation_data {
> > > __u64 len;
> > > __u32 heap_id_mask;
> > > __u32 flags;
> > > __u32 fd;
> > > __u32 unused;
> > > };
> > >
> > > int main(void)
> > > {
> > > unsigned long i = 0;
> > > int fd = -1;
> > > struct ion_allocation_data data = {
> > > .len = 0x13f65d8c,
> > > .heap_id_mask = 1,
> > > .flags = 0,
> > > .fd = -1,
> > > .unused = 0
> > > };
> > >
> > > fd = open("/dev/ion", 0);
> > > if (fd == -1) {
> > > perror("[-] open /dev/ion");
> > > return 1;
> > > }
> > >
> > > while (1) {
> > > printf("iter %lu\n", i);
> > > ioctl(fd, ION_IOC_ALLOC, &data);
> > > i++;
> > > }
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > I looked through the code of ion_alloc() and didn't find any limit checks.
> > > Is it currently possible to limit ION kernel allocations for some process?
> > >
> > > If not, is it a right idea to do that?
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I do think that's the right approach. We're working on moving Ion
> > out of staging and this is something I mentioned to John Stultz. I don't
> > think we've thought too hard about how to do the actual limiting so
> > suggestions are welcome.
>
> In part the dmabuf heaps allow for separate heap devices, so we can
> have finer grained permissions to the specific heaps. But that
> doesn't provide any controls on how much memory one process could
> allocate using the device if it has permission.
>
> I suspect the same issue is present with any of the dmabuf exporters
> (gpu/display drivers, etc), so this is less of an ION/dmabuf heap
> issue and more of a dmabuf core accounting issue.
>
Also, do unmapped memfd buffers have similar accounting issues?
thanks
-john
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
