On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 10:37 PM Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > struct ip_vs_conn *ctl_cp = cp->control;
> > if (!ctl_cp) {
> > - IP_VS_ERR_BUF("request control DEL for uncontrolled: "
> > - "%s:%d to %s:%d\n",
> > - IP_VS_DBG_ADDR(cp->af, &cp->caddr),
> > - ntohs(cp->cport),
> > - IP_VS_DBG_ADDR(cp->af, &cp->vaddr),
> > - ntohs(cp->vport));
> > + pr_err("request control DEL for uncontrolled: "
> > + "%pISp to %pISp\n",
(replying a bit late)
> ip_vs_dbg_addr() used compact form (%pI6c), so it would be
> better to use %pISc and %pISpc everywhere in IPVS...
done
> Also, note that before now port was printed with %d and
> ntohs() was used, now port should be in network order, so:
>
> - ntohs() should be removed
done
> - htons() should be added, if missing. At first look, this case
> is not present in IPVS, we have only ntohs() usage
I found one case in ip_vs_ftp_in() that needs it in order to subtract one:
IP_VS_DBG(7, "protocol %s %pISpc %pISpc\n",
ip_vs_proto_name(ipvsh->protocol),
- IP_VS_DBG_SOCKADDR(cp->af, &to, ntohs(port)),
+ IP_VS_DBG_SOCKADDR(cp->af, &to, port),
IP_VS_DBG_SOCKADDR(cp->af, &cp->vaddr,
- ntohs(cp->vport)-1));
+ htons(ntohs(cp->vport)-1)));
Thanks for the review, I'll send a new patch after some more
build testing on the new version.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
