On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:01:33PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:05:07PM +0000, Ajay.Kathat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > On 7/19/2019 5:16 PM, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> > >
> > > <Ajay.Kathat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 于2019年7月19日周五 下午7:34写道：
> > >>
> > >> On 7/19/2019 1:40 PM, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Merge the combo use of memcpy and le32_to_cpus.
> > >>> Use get_unaligned_le32 instead.
> > >>> This simplifies the code.
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c | 3 +--
> > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> > >>> index d72fdd333050..12fb4add05ec 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> > >>> @@ -1038,8 +1038,7 @@ void wilc_wfi_p2p_rx(struct wilc_vif *vif, u8 *buff, u32 size)
> > >>> s32 freq;
> > >>> __le16 fc;
> > >>>
> > >>> - memcpy(&header, (buff - HOST_HDR_OFFSET), HOST_HDR_OFFSET);
> > >>> - le32_to_cpus(&header);
> > >>> + header = get_unaligned_le32(buff - HOST_HDR_OFFSET);
> > >>> pkt_offset = GET_PKT_OFFSET(header);
> > >>>
> > >>> if (pkt_offset & IS_MANAGMEMENT_CALLBACK) {
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for sending the patches.
> > >>
> > >> The code change looks okay to me. Just a minor comment, avoid the use of
> > >> same subject line for different patches.
> > >
> > > These two patches are in the same subsystem and solve the same problem.
> > > I splitted them into two patches by mistake since I did not notice the problems
> > > in the second patch when I sent the first one.
> > > Should I merge the two patches and resend?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, please go ahead, merge the patches and send the updated version.
> >
>
> This is wrong advice. Don't merge the patches because they are for
> different drivers. The original subjects are fine because the
> subsystems are different so that's okay.
>
Oh... My bad... I was looking at the wrong patches. :P You are
100% correct Ajay. Merge the two patches and always make sure to not
send multiple patches with the same subject.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
