On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 08:37:42PM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote: > I have an out-of-tree driver for the exfat file system that I beaten into shape > for upstreaming. The driver works, and passes sparse and checkpatch (except > for a number of line-too-long complaints). > > Do you want this taken straight to the fs/ tree, or through drivers/staging? How have you dealt with the patent claims which Microsoft has asserted[1] on the exFAT file system design? [1] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/mtl/exfat-licensing.aspx I am not making any claims about the validity of Microsoft's patent assertions on exFAT, one way or another. But it might be a good idea for some laywers from the Linux Foundation to render some legal advice to their employees (namely Greg K-H and Linus Torvalds) regarding the advisability of taking exFAT into the official Linux tree. Personally, if Microsoft is going to be unfriendly about not wanting others to use their file system technology by making patent claims, why should we reward them by making their file system better by improvings its interoperability? (My personal opinion only.) Cheers, - Ted _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
