On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 03:04:08AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c:200:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
>
> Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
>
> Fixes: abddd78ef465 ("staging: kpc2000: Fix: 'kpc_dma_del_device' and other symbols were not declared")
> CC: Rishiraj Manwatkar <manwatkar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: e2d28c40292bdc35553d599e5bbbeaefbab49416
> commit: abddd78ef465b86fc89a3d9750bb76a138bc0859 [5641/8196] staging: kpc2000: Fix: 'kpc_dma_del_device' and other symbols were not declared
>
> kpc_dma_driver.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c
> @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static struct platform_driver kpc_dma_pl
> .remove = kpc_dma_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = KP_DRIVER_NAME_DMA_CONTROLLER,
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> },
> };
Already in my tree, I think you are a bit behind :)
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
