Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad7150: use ternary operating to ensure 0/1 value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:15:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:50:59 -0300
> Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Remove idiom and use ternary operator for consistently trigger 0/1 value
> > on variable declaration.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@xxxxxxxxx>
> Hi Melissa,
> 
> In general I would consider this unnecessary churn as, whilst
> it's no longer a favoured idiom, it is extremely common in the
> kernel.

It's still my favourite...  Why wouldn't people like it?  It feels like
last week I just saw someone send a bunch of:

-	foo = (bar == baz) ? 1 : 0;
+	foo = (bar == baz);

patches and I thought it was an improvement at the time...

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux