On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:15:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:50:59 -0300 > Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Remove idiom and use ternary operator for consistently trigger 0/1 value > > on variable declaration. > > > > Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@xxxxxxxxx> > Hi Melissa, > > In general I would consider this unnecessary churn as, whilst > it's no longer a favoured idiom, it is extremely common in the > kernel. It's still my favourite... Why wouldn't people like it? It feels like last week I just saw someone send a bunch of: - foo = (bar == baz) ? 1 : 0; + foo = (bar == baz); patches and I thought it was an improvement at the time... regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
