On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:08:25PM +0530, Merwin Trever Ferrao wrote:
> From: Merwin Trever Ferrao <Merwintf@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fixed a coding style issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Merwin Trever Ferrao <merwintf@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c | 32 ++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
> index eee1998c4b18..5424e2682911 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
> @@ -324,8 +324,7 @@ static int prism2_scan(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> (i < request->n_channels) && i < ARRAY_SIZE(prism2_channels);
> i++)
> msg1.channellist.data.data[i] =
> - ieee80211_frequency_to_channel(
> - request->channels[i]->center_freq);
> + ieee80211_frequency_to_channel(request->channels[i]->center_freq);
And now you violate the other coding style rule of too long lines :(
You can just keep sending patches fixing this back and forth, if you
want a never-ending set of patches to be applied, but we don't really
like that.
So the code is ok as-is.
> msg1.channellist.data.len = request->n_channels;
>
> msg1.maxchanneltime.data = 250;
> @@ -359,15 +358,15 @@ static int prism2_scan(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> freq = ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(msg2.dschannel.data,
> NL80211_BAND_2GHZ);
> bss = cfg80211_inform_bss(wiphy,
> - ieee80211_get_channel(wiphy, freq),
> - CFG80211_BSS_FTYPE_UNKNOWN,
> - (const u8 *)&msg2.bssid.data.data,
> - msg2.timestamp.data, msg2.capinfo.data,
> - msg2.beaconperiod.data,
> - ie_buf,
> - ie_len,
> - (msg2.signal.data - 65536) * 100, /* Conversion to signed type */
> - GFP_KERNEL
> + ieee80211_get_channel(wiphy, freq),
> + CFG80211_BSS_FTYPE_UNKNOWN,
> + (const u8 *)&msg2.bssid.data.data,
> + msg2.timestamp.data, msg2.capinfo.data,
> + msg2.beaconperiod.data,
> + ie_buf,
> + ie_len,
> + (msg2.signal.data - 65536) * 100, /* Conversion to signed type */
> + GFP_KERNEL
> );
Why is this final ); way over here?
>
> if (!bss) {
> @@ -475,14 +474,13 @@ static int prism2_connect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
> }
>
> result = prism2_domibset_uint32(wlandev,
> - DIDMIB_DOT11SMT_PRIVACYTABLE_WEPDEFAULTKEYID,
> - sme->key_idx);
> + DIDMIB_DOT11SMT_PRIVACYTABLE_WEPDEFAULTKEYID,
> + sme->key_idx);
> if (result)
> goto exit;
>
> /* send key to driver */
> - did = didmib_dot11smt_wepdefaultkeystable_key(
> - sme->key_idx + 1);
> + did = didmib_dot11smt_wepdefaultkeystable_key(sme->key_idx + 1);
Too long of a line.
Remember, checkpatch is just a "hint", you still have to use your brain
when looking at the output of it.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
