On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 10:57:24PM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> This patch fixes below warnings reported by coccicheck
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c:501:4-10: Unneeded
> variable: "result". Return "HAL_STATUS_SUCCESS" on line 526
>
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@xxxxxxxxx>
> -----
> Changes in v2:
> - fixed typo in commit message
> ---
>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c
> index d802a1f..4711c65 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c
> @@ -498,8 +498,6 @@ HAL_STATUS ODM_ConfigBBWithHeaderFile(
>
> HAL_STATUS ODM_ConfigMACWithHeaderFile(PDM_ODM_T pDM_Odm)
> {
> - u8 result = HAL_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> -
> ODM_RT_TRACE(
> pDM_Odm,
> ODM_COMP_INIT,
> @@ -523,5 +521,5 @@ HAL_STATUS ODM_ConfigMACWithHeaderFile(PDM_ODM_T pDM_Odm)
>
> READ_AND_CONFIG(8723B, _MAC_REG);
>
> - return result;
> + return HAL_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> }
This whole function should really be reduced to just one line (the trace
stuff is not needed), and as this can not fail, it should not be
returning a value.
And if it can be one line, then why is it a function at all? It's only
called in one place.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
