Fix following checkpatch.pl warnings by using %s and __func__
in strings instead of function names.
WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'rtw_report_sec_ie', this function's name, in a string
and other similar warning.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/mlme_linux.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/mlme_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
index 9db11b16cb93..e660bd4d91ef 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
@@ -93,11 +93,11 @@ void rtw_report_sec_ie(struct adapter *adapter, u8 authmode, u8 *sec_ie)
union iwreq_data wrqu;
RT_TRACE(_module_mlme_osdep_c_, _drv_info_,
- ("+rtw_report_sec_ie, authmode=%d\n", authmode));
+ ("+%s, authmode=%d\n", __func__, authmode));
buff = NULL;
if (authmode == _WPA_IE_ID_) {
RT_TRACE(_module_mlme_osdep_c_, _drv_info_,
- ("rtw_report_sec_ie, authmode=%d\n", authmode));
+ ("%s, authmode=%d\n", __func__, authmode));
buff = rtw_malloc(IW_CUSTOM_MAX);
if (!buff)
return;
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ void rtw_indicate_sta_assoc_event(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *pst
memcpy(wrqu.addr.sa_data, psta->hwaddr, ETH_ALEN);
- DBG_88E("+rtw_indicate_sta_assoc_event\n");
+ DBG_88E("+%s\n", __func__);
wireless_send_event(padapter->pnetdev, IWEVREGISTERED, &wrqu, NULL);
}
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void rtw_indicate_sta_disassoc_event(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *
memcpy(wrqu.addr.sa_data, psta->hwaddr, ETH_ALEN);
- DBG_88E("+rtw_indicate_sta_disassoc_event\n");
+ DBG_88E("+%s\n", __func__);
wireless_send_event(padapter->pnetdev, IWEVEXPIRED, &wrqu, NULL);
}
--
2.21.0
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
