On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 10:19:14AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Petr Štetiar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this patch series is an attempt to fix the mess, I've somehow managed to > > introduce. > > > > First patch in this series is defacto v5 of the previous 05/10 patch in the > > series, but since the v4 of this 05/10 patch wasn't picked up by the > > patchwork for some unknown reason, this patch wasn't applied with the other > > 9 patches in the series, so I'm resending it as a separate patch of this > > fixup series again. > > I feel sort of ridiculous asking this over and over... Maybe your spam > filter is eating my emails? > > This bug was introduced in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1094916/ > "[v4,01/10] of_net: add NVMEM support to of_get_mac_address" but it > looks like no one applied it. > > You're acting as if it *was* applied but you refuse to answer my > question who applied it and which to which tree so I can figure out what > went wrong. > > I only see comments from last Friday that it shouldn't be applied... I > also told you on Friday in a different thread that that patch shouldn't > be applied. Breaking git bisect is a bug, and we never do that. I'm > just very confused right now... What I'm trying to do is figure out in > my head how this process failed so we can do better next time. Just to resend this, so that it hopefully does _not_ get stuck in a spam filter. Petr, please address Dan's comments, do not ignore them. greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
