On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:22 AM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ah ok, it's like a standard way of implementing a bus. Sounds good, I'll > spin a patch to conform to it. And while I'm at it, I'll rename fieldbus_type > because it can be confused with another fieldbus_type within the > fieldbus_dev core. Nicholas, this future patch will silence sparse. So you can drop the patch you proposed at the beginning of this email thread. Thanks for your help, really appreciate it. Sven _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
