On Mo, 2019-04-15 at 23:21 +0200, Eugeniu Rosca wrote: > External E-Mail > > > Hello Christian, hello Andrey, > cc: Vladimir Barinov > cc: linux-renesas-soc > > Our team currently has the requirement of adding MOST support to > the v4.14-based R-Car3 kernel [1], matching the level of features > and interfaces of mld-1.8.0 [2] release. > > Based on a quick check [3], the mld-1.8.0 release contains 221 non- > merge > non-mainline commits. It seems like at least some (most?) of them > have > been reworked during upstreaming and are now part of vanilla, thanks > to > your efforts. > > Since you've actively participated in pushing the out-of-tree drivers > to mainline, could you please share your gut feeling whether the > current mainline state of the MOST subsystem matches the mld-1.8.0 > release in terms of features and interfaces? > No, it doesn't. The version upstream does not have all the bells and whistles the mld-1.8.0 version has, yet. Focus of the latest mainline commits was on the driver model and the switch to configfs. > At first glance, such mld-1.8.0 functionalities like "flexible PCM > rate support" [4], as well as a number of dim2 sysfs entries [5-8] > appear to be missing in v5.1-rc5. Could you please feedback if these > have been deliberately dropped or didn't make their way for another > reason? What would be your recommendation between going the mld-1.8.0 > and going the v5.1-rc5 way for MOST? > The functionalities you're referring to have _not_ intentionally been dropped. They will find their way into mainline. If there are urgent feature requests, we could prioritize them. Bottom line is, the upstream version is the one you should be using, as it is going to replace the mld-1.x branch. This is exactly what we will soon be doing for AGL by the way. thanks, Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
