> -----Original Message----- > From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, 15 April 2019 9:04 PM > To: 'Alastair D'Silva' <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Petr Mladek' > <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: 'Alastair D'Silva' <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Jani Nikula' > <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Joonas Lahtinen' > <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Rodrigo Vivi' <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; > 'David Airlie' <airlied@xxxxxxxx>; 'Daniel Vetter' <daniel@xxxxxxxx>; 'Karsten > Keil' <isdn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Jassi Brar' <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Tom > Lendacky' <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>; 'David S. Miller' > <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Jose Abreu' <Jose.Abreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Kalle > Valo' <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Stanislaw Gruszka' <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>; > 'Benson Leung' <bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Enric Balletbo i Serra' > <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'James E.J. Bottomley' > <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Martin K. Petersen' <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>; > 'Greg Kroah-Hartman' <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Alexander Viro' > <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Sergey Senozhatsky' > <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Steven Rostedt' > <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Andrew Morton' <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > ath10k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] lib/hexdump.c: Replace ascii bool in > hex_dump_to_buffer with flags > > From: Alastair D'Silva > > Sent: 15 April 2019 11:45 > ... > > > Although I think you'd want a 'no hex' flag to suppress the hex. > > > > > > Probably more useful flags are ones to suppress the address column. > > > > This is already supported by the prefix_type parameter - are you > > proposing that we eliminate the parameter & combine it with flags? > > I was looking at the flags on one of my hexdump() functions... > > > > I've also used flags to enable (or disable) suppression of multiple > > > lines of zeros of constant bytes. > > > In that case you may want hexdump to return the flags for the next > > > call when a large buffer is being dumped in fragments. > > > > I'm afraid I don't quite follow here, hex_dump_to_buffer doesn't alter > > the flags, so the caller already knows it. > > If you are suppressing lines of zeros and dumping a buffer in several blocks > then subsequent calls need to know that the last line of the previous call was > suppressed zeros - and carry on with the same suppressed block. Why wouldn't you do this with a single call to print_hex_dump? (that is where the repeated lines are suppressed) That will already take chunks of the buffer until the whole thing is output, in what situation do you see a caller chunking the access themselves? -- Alastair D'Silva mob: 0423 762 819 skype: alastair_dsilva msn: alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx blog: http://alastair.d-silva.org Twitter: @EvilDeece _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
