On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:23:44AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:20:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:35:37AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > A previous commit to make acpi table parsing more common to variable
> > > header types modified a callback type that was not intended to be
> > > included. Fix the callback parameter.
> > >
> > > Fixes: commit 088d0b345be1952b ("acpi: Create subtable parsing infrastructure")
> > > Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> > > index ccb9a6385208..1435e7a1a8cd 100644
> > > --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> > > +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> > > @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static void __init acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int __init acpi_parse_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *table)
> > > +static int __init acpi_parse_madt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> > > {
> > > acpi_madt = (struct acpi_table_madt *)table;
> > >
> >
> > Can I just fold this into the original patch? I haven't pushed it out
> > to a "public" tree that can not be rebased just yet.
>
> Yes please, that would be my preference as well.
Ok, now folded together and pushed out, let's see what 0-day says about
this one...
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
