You should probably update the subject line because now it's not just
about parentheses any more.
[PATCH v2] Staging: rtlwifi: clean up crc16_ccitt()
So the one thing per patch rule is a little bit about selling your
patch. We never allow "Clean up whole_file.c" but we do sometimes allow
"Clean up a function()" so long as the patch description sells it in
the right way.
Blah blah function does "BIT(0) << i" instead of "BIT(i)". Using !!
is slightly shorter than "foo ? 1 : 0". Blah blah, etc.
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:38:51PM -0500, Madhumitha Prabakaran wrote:
> @@ -351,13 +351,13 @@ static u16 crc16_ccitt(u8 data, u16 crc)
> else
> result |= BIT(0);
>
> - crc_bit11 = ((crc & BIT(11)) ? 1 : 0) ^ shift_in;
> + crc_bit11 = !!(crc & BIT(11)) ^ shift_in;
> if (crc_bit11 == 0)
> result &= (~BIT(12));
^ ^
I thought your Coccinelle script was going to complain about these
parentheses. Probably the &= confuses it? There are a couple others
in the same function.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
