Hi Laurent,
On Tue 12 Mar 2019 at 14:10, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Rui,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 02:05:24PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva
wrote:
On Sun 10 Mar 2019 at 21:41, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
Where have you been for the latest 14 versions? :)
Elsewhere I suppose :-)
eheh.
This is already merged, but... follow up patches can address
your
issues bellow.
I saw the driver and DT bindings patches merged in the media
tree for
v5.2, where have the DT patches been merged ?
Good question, now that you talk I do not think they were merged.
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:13:23PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva
> wrote:
>> This patch adds the device tree nodes for csi, video
>> multiplexer and mipi-csi besides the graph connecting the
>> necessary
>> endpoints to make the media capture entities to work in imx7
>> Warp
>> board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts | 51
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++
>
> I would have split this in two patches to make backporting
> easier, but it's not a big deal.
>
> Please see below for a few additional comments.
>
>> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts
>> index 23431faecaf4..358bcae7ebaf 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s-warp.dts
>> @@ -277,6 +277,57 @@
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>>
>> +&gpr {
>> + csi_mux {
>> + compatible = "video-mux";
>> + mux-controls = <&mux 0>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + port@1 {
>> + reg = <1>;
>> +
>> + csi_mux_from_mipi_vc0: endpoint {
>> + remote-endpoint =
>> <&mipi_vc0_to_csi_mux>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + port@2 {
>> + reg = <2>;
>> +
>> + csi_mux_to_csi: endpoint {
>> + remote-endpoint =
>> <&csi_from_csi_mux>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> +&csi {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + port {
>> + csi_from_csi_mux: endpoint {
>> + remote-endpoint = <&csi_mux_to_csi>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>
> Shouldn't these two nodes, as well as port@1 of the mipi_csi
> node, be moved to imx7d.dtsi ?
Yeah, I guess you are right here.
>
>> +
>> +&mipi_csi {
>> + clock-frequency = <166000000>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + fsl,csis-hs-settle = <3>;
>
> Shouldn't this be an endpoint property ? Different sensors
> connected
> through different endpoints could have different timing
> requirements.
Hum... I see you point, even tho the phy hs-settle is a common
control.
I suppose we don't need to care about DT backward compatibility
if we
make changes in the bindings for v5.2 ? Would you fix this, or
do you
want a patch ?
I will try to take a look at this until end of week.
---
Cheers,
Rui
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
