On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:53:37PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Remove a duplicate definition of VP set (hv_vp_set) and use the common > > definition (hv_vpset) that is used in other places. > > > > Change the order of the members in struct hv_pcibus_device so that the > > declaration of retarget_msi_interrupt_params is the last member. Struct > > hv_vpset, which contains a flexible array, is nested two levels deep in > > struct hv_pcibus_device via retarget_msi_interrupt_params. > > > > Add a comment that retarget_msi_interrupt_params should be the last member > > of struct hv_pcibus_device. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maya Nakamura <m.maya.nakamura@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Change in v3: > > - Correct the v2 change log. > > > > Change in v2: > > - Update the commit message. > > > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 25 ++++++++++++------------- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > > index 9ba4d12c179c..da8b58d8630d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > > @@ -393,12 +393,6 @@ struct hv_interrupt_entry { > > > > #define HV_VP_SET_BANK_COUNT_MAX 5 /* current implementation limit */ > > > > -struct hv_vp_set { > > - u64 format; /* 0 (HvGenericSetSparse4k) */ > > - u64 valid_banks; > > - u64 masks[HV_VP_SET_BANK_COUNT_MAX]; > > -}; > > - > > /* > > * flags for hv_device_interrupt_target.flags > > */ > > @@ -410,7 +404,7 @@ struct hv_device_interrupt_target { > > u32 flags; > > union { > > u64 vp_mask; > > - struct hv_vp_set vp_set; > > + struct hv_vpset vp_set; > > }; > > }; > > > > @@ -460,12 +454,16 @@ struct hv_pcibus_device { > > struct msi_controller msi_chip; > > struct irq_domain *irq_domain; > > > > - /* hypercall arg, must not cross page boundary */ > > - struct retarget_msi_interrupt retarget_msi_interrupt_params; > > - > > spinlock_t retarget_msi_interrupt_lock; > > > > struct workqueue_struct *wq; > > + > > + /* hypercall arg, must not cross page boundary */ > > + struct retarget_msi_interrupt retarget_msi_interrupt_params; > > + > > One more thing here (and again sorry for being late): this structure is > being used as Hyper-V hypercall argument and these have special > requirements on alignment (8 bytes). struct retarget_msi_interrupt is > packed and depending on your environment/compiler you may or may not see > the issue but I has able to get HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT failing with > the return value of 4 (HV_STATUS_INVALID_ALIGNMENT). > > I suggest we add __aligned(8) to 'struct retarget_msi_interrupt' > definition (I haven't tested this but should work). This is not a new > issue, it existed before your patch, but the code movement you do may > change the exposure. I am happy to apply this small fix _before_ this patch but if you want me to merge them for v5.1 this must be put together and tested quite quickly. For the time being I am not dropping this patch from the PCI queue, waiting for an update from you guys. Thanks, Lorenzo > > > > + /* > > + * Don't put anything here: retarget_msi_interrupt_params must be last > > + */ > > }; > > > > /* > > @@ -955,12 +953,13 @@ static void hv_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data) > > */ > > params->int_target.flags |= > > HV_DEVICE_INTERRUPT_TARGET_PROCESSOR_SET; > > - params->int_target.vp_set.valid_banks = > > + params->int_target.vp_set.valid_bank_mask = > > (1ull << HV_VP_SET_BANK_COUNT_MAX) - 1; > > > > /* > > * var-sized hypercall, var-size starts after vp_mask (thus > > - * vp_set.format does not count, but vp_set.valid_banks does). > > + * vp_set.format does not count, but vp_set.valid_bank_mask > > + * does). > > */ > > var_size = 1 + HV_VP_SET_BANK_COUNT_MAX; > > > > @@ -974,7 +973,7 @@ static void hv_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data) > > goto exit_unlock; > > } > > > > - params->int_target.vp_set.masks[cpu_vmbus / 64] |= > > + params->int_target.vp_set.bank_contents[cpu_vmbus / 64] |= > > (1ULL << (cpu_vmbus & 63)); > > } > > } else { > > -- > Vitaly _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel