Le 2/9/19 à 10:21 AM, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:32:42AM CET, f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Following patches will change the way we communicate getting or setting
>
> Just "setting", no "getting".
>
>
>> a port's attribute and use a blocking notifier to perform those tasks.
>>
>> Prepare rocker to support receiving notifier events targeting
>> SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and simply translate that into the existing
>> rocker_port_attr_set call.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
>> index ff3f14504f4f..f10e4888ecff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
>> @@ -2811,6 +2811,24 @@ rocker_switchdev_port_obj_event(unsigned long event, struct net_device *netdev,
>> return notifier_from_errno(err);
>> }
>>
>> +static int
>> +rocker_switchdev_port_attr_event(unsigned long event, struct net_device *netdev,
>> + struct switchdev_notifier_port_attr_info
>> + *port_attr_info)
>> +{
>> + int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + switch (event) {
>> + case SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET:
>
> Do you expect some other event to be handled in
> rocker_switchdev_port_attr_event()? Because you have SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET
> selected in case here and in rocker_switchdev_blocking_event.
> Perhaps you can rename rocker_switchdev_port_attr_event() to
> rocker_switchdev_port_attr_set_event() and avoid this switchcase.
That's a good point, I have PORT_ATTR_{GET_SET} initially which was the
reason for the switch/case statement, will change it according to your
suggestion. Thanks!
--
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
