> Sure, add these test results to the patch as well showing reduced wakeups. > > I would say submit the freezable_schedule as a single separate patch > independent of the vsoc series since it can go in separately, and also > benefits other things than vsoc. > > Also CC Rafael (power maintainer) on it. Thanks, I have splitted the patch set[0][1] and submitted the freezable_schedule patch separately (only cc-ing people responsible for the wait api + Rafael). regards, Hugo [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/7/802 [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/7/870 -- Hugo Lefeuvre (hle) | www.owl.eu.com RSA4096_ 360B 03B3 BF27 4F4D 7A3F D5E8 14AA 1EB8 A247 3DFD ed25519_ 37B2 6D38 0B25 B8A2 6B9F 3A65 A36F 5357 5F2D DC4C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
