On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 09:51:36AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:53:14PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Based on discussion with Ido and feedback from Jakub there are clearly > > two classes of users that implement SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PARENT_ID: > > > > - PF/VF drivers which typically only implement return the port's parent > > ID, yet have to implement switchdev_port_attr_get() just for that > > > > - Ethernet switch drivers: mlxsw, ocelot, DSA, etc. which implement more > > attributes which we want to be able to eventually veto in the context > > of the caller, thus making them candidates for using a blocking notifier > > chain > > Florian, patches look good to me. I'm going to build a kernel with these > patches and run some tests. Will report later today. Ran most of our tests and nothing exploded. Thanks! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
