Sorry for the delay due to business travel. On 2019/1/29 2:30, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:41:55AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: >> Hi Dan and Xiang, >> >> On 2019-1-28 21:48, Gao Xiang wrote: >>> Hi Dan, >>> >>> On 2019/1/28 21:33, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>>> Hopefully, regular kmalloc() is enough. >>>> >>>> Do really need the erofs_kmalloc() function? Regular kmalloc() has >>>> fault injection already. Have you tried to use it? >> >> Yes, I think we'd better to use erofs_kmalloc(). :) >> >> Actually, fault injection in erofs_kmalloc only affect erofs module, we can >> expect that the range of fault can be limited in erofs code, rather than whole >> kernel, so the test point can be aimed at more accurately. >> > > Are you serious? The standard fault injection doesn't do that??? Oh, I just realized the common fault injection can inject into specified module with function granularity, sorry. > > Please fix it instead of creating a duplicate better implementation > which only your filesystem can use. I would have thought that obviously I agreed that it will be good to make common fault injection better, covering more cases, so that it can benefit all modules which need fault injection functionality. But rather than injecting kmalloc, there will be other injection demands from erofs/f2fs, like injecting in the middle of their specified function, how could we do that? Could you give us advice? Thanks, > any fault injection framework could at least be configured to test > specific code... > > regards, > dan carpenter > > > . > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
