On 1/25/19 9:14 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 04:29:05PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
tty_set_termios() has the following WARMN_ON which can be triggered with a
syscall to invoke TIOCGETD __NR_ioctl.
WARN_ON(tty->driver->type == TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_PTY &&
tty->driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_MASTER);
Reference: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=2410d22f1d8e5984217329dd0884b01d99e3e48d
A simple change would have been to print error message instead of WARN_ON.
However, the callers assume that tty_set_termios() always returns 0 and
don't check return value. The complete solution is fixing all the callers
to check error and bail out to fix the WARN_ON.
This fix changes tty_set_termios() to return error and all the callers
to check error and bail out. The reproducer is used to reproduce the
problem and verify the fix.
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
@@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ void hci_uart_set_flow_control(struct hci_uart *hu, bool enable)
status = tty_set_termios(tty, &ktermios);
BT_DBG("Disabling hardware flow control: %s",
status ? "failed" : "success");
+ if (status)
+ return;
Can that ldisc end up set on pty master? And does it make any sense there?
The initial objective of the patch is to prevent the WARN_ON by making
the change to return error instead of WARN_ON. However, without changes
to places that don't check the return and keep making progress, there
will be secondary problems.
Without this change to return here, instead of WARN_ON, it will fail
with the following NULL pointer dereference at the next thing
hci_uart_set_flow_control() attempts.
status = tty->driver->ops->tiocmget(tty);
kernel: [10140.649783] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at 0000000000000000
kernel: [10140.649786] #PF error: [INSTR]
kernel: [10140.649787] PGD 0 P4D 0
kernel: [10140.649790] Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP PTI
Jan 24 15:33:35 deneb kernel: [10140.649793] CPU: 2 PID: 55 Comm:
kworker/u33:0 Tainted: G W 5.0.0-rc3+ #5
kernel: [10140.649794] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 790/0HY9JP,
BIOS A18 09/24/2013
Workqueue: hci0 hci_power_on [bluetooth]
kernel: [10140.649805] RIP: 0010: (null)
kernel: [10140.649809] Code: Bad RIP value.
kernel: [10140.649810] RSP: 0018:ffffa01a8153fd28 EFLAGS: 00010282
kernel: [10140.649812] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8958d6bc4800 RCX:
35ad8b0300000000
kernel: [10140.649814] RDX: ffffffff00000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI:
ffff8958d6bc4800
kernel: [10140.649816] RBP: ffffa01a8153fd78 R08: 0000000091773f09 R09:
0000000000000003
kernel: [10140.649817] R10: ffff8958d6bc4a98 R11: 0000000000000720 R12:
ffff895814500c00
kernel: [10140.649819] R13: ffff8958a858e000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
ffff8958af1af440
kernel: [10140.649821] FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
GS:ffff895925880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
kernel: [10140.649823] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
kernel: [10140.649824] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 0000000083f46002 CR4:
00000000000606e0
kernel: [10140.649826] Call Trace:
kernel: [10140.649830] ? hci_uart_set_flow_control+0x20e/0x2c0 [hci_uart]
kernel: [10140.649836] mrvl_setup+0x17/0x80 [hci_uart]
kernel: [10140.649840] hci_uart_setup+0x56/0x160 [hci_uart]
kernel: [10140.649850] hci_dev_do_open+0xe6/0x630 [bluetooth]
kernel: [10140.649860] hci_power_on+0x52/0x220 [bluetooth]
IOW, I don't believe that this patch makes any sense. If anything,
we need to prevent unconditional tty_set_termios() on the path
that *does* lead to calling it for pty.
I don't think preventing unconditional tty_set_termios() is enough to
prevent secondary problems such as the one above.
For example, the following call chain leads to the WARN_ON that was
reported. Even if void hci_uart_set_baudrate() prevents the very first
tty_set_termios() call, its caller hci_uart_setup() continues with
more tty setup. It goes ahead to call driver setup callback. The
driver callback goes on to do more setup calling tty_set_termios().
WARN_ON call path:
hci_uart_set_baudrate+0x1cc/0x250 drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c:378
hci_uart_setup+0xa2/0x490 drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c:401
hci_dev_do_open+0x6b1/0x1920 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:1423
Once this WARN_ON is changed to return error, the following
happens, when hci_uart_setup() does driver setup callback.
kernel: [10140.649836] mrvl_setup+0x17/0x80 [hci_uart]
kernel: [10140.649840] hci_uart_setup+0x56/0x160 [hci_uart]
kernel: [10140.649850] hci_dev_do_open+0xe6/0x630 [bluetooth]
kernel: [10140.649860] hci_power_on+0x52/0x220 [bluetooth]
I think continuing to catch the invalid condition in tty_set_termios()
and preventing progress by checking return value is a straight forward
change to avoid secondary problems, and it might be difficult to catch
all the cases where it could fail. Here is the reproducer for reference:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <endian.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
uint64_t r[1] = {0xffffffffffffffff};
int main(void)
{
syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000, 0x1000000, 3, 0x32, -1, 0);
long res = 0;
memcpy((void*)0x20000100, "/dev/ptmx\x00", 10);
res = syscall(__NR_openat, 0xffffffffffffff9c, 0x20000100, 0, 0);
if (res != -1)
r[0] = res;
*(uint32_t*)0x200000c0 = 0xf;
syscall(__NR_ioctl, r[0], 0x5423, 0x200000c0);
syscall(__NR_ioctl, r[0], 0x400455c8, 0xb);
return 0;
}
thanks,
-- Shuah
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
