> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 10:17 AM > To: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 18:00:29 +0000 > Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:35:43 +0000 > > > Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Before 98f4c651762c, we returned zeros for unopened channels. > > > > With 98f4c651762c, we started to return random on-stack values. > > > > > > > > We'd better return -EINVAL instead. > > > > > > The concept looks fine, but maybe it would be simpler to move it into > > > hv_ringbuffer_get_debuginfo and have it return an error code. > > > > > > Since so much of the code is repeated, I would probably make a > > > macro which generates the code as well. > > > > > > Something like this: > > > > Thanks, Stephen! Now the patch has been in char-misc's char-misc-linus > > branch, so IMO we may as well leave it as is (considering the code here is > > unlikely to be frqeuencly changed), and we have a smaller patch this way. :-) > > > > But, yes, I agree with you that generally we should make a common > > function to avoid duplicate code. > > > > Thanks, > > -- Dexuan > > The old code was risky because it would silently return stack garbage. > Having an error check in get_debuginfo would eliminate that. OK, then let me make another patch based on the latest char-misc-linus. Thanks, -- Dexuan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
