On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 01:13:08PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 04:56:29PM +0530, Nishad Kamdar wrote:
> > This switches the flexfb.c to use GPIO descriptors
> > rather than numerical gpios.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/fbtft/flexfb.c | 12 ++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/flexfb.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/flexfb.c
> > index 2af474469e7d..c5fa59105a43 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/flexfb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/flexfb.c
> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> >
> > @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static int flexfb_verify_gpios_dc(struct fbtft_par *par)
> > {
> > fbtft_par_dbg(DEBUG_VERIFY_GPIOS, par, "%s()\n", __func__);
> >
> > - if (par->gpio.dc < 0) {
> > + if (!par->gpio.dc) {
> > dev_err(par->info->device,
> > "Missing info about 'dc' gpio. Aborting.\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> We changed par->gpio.c from an int to a pointer in patch 1 so we have
> to update all the checks as well in the same patch. Otherwise it breaks
> `git bisect`.
>
> (I don't know this code well. But it just feels like it has to be
> breaking git bisect just from from glancing at the patches. Perhaps I
> have misunderstood).
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Ok. I'll merge them into one patch.
Thanks for the review and the pointer.
Regards,
Nishad
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
