On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:13 AM Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:23:52PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > It's based off the driver from the OLPC kernel sources. Somewhat > > modernized and cleaned up, for better or worse. > > > > Modified to plug into the olpc-ec driver infrastructure (so that battery > > interface and debugfs could be reused) and the SPI slave framework. > > - Count the terminating NUL in LOG_BUF_SIZE > > - Make olpc_xo175_ec_is_valid_cmd() return -EINVAL instead of -1 > > on error > > - Spell keyboard/touchpad in full for CHAN_KEYBOARD/TOUCHPAD messages > > - Use a #define for PM wakeup processing time > > - Log a message on unknown event > > - Escape logging payload with %*pE > > - Replace an open-coded min() > > - Correct an error code on short read > > - replaced PM callback #ifdefs with __maybe_unusedm SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS > > and SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS > > - dev_get_drvdata() instead of a round-trip through platform device > > - s/unsigned char x/u8 x/ in olpc_xo175_ec_resume() > > - Use GENMASK() instead of 0xffff for the event mask > > - Replace cmd tx/resp rx buffers with structures > > - Turned suspend hint arguments into a struct, and tidied up the comment > > Just from these comments, each of these could be a separate patch. You > can group related things together, or those that change the same line or > function for example. Order them with cleanups / non-functional-changes > first, followed by functional changes. > > > > > Basically all of the above is based on the review by Andy Shevchenko. > > Andy, what was your intent for Lubomir here? From the above, this looks > like it should be several patches to me. This is a new module, I don't see why it can't be one patch. For the existing code I agree with you. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
