On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 00:20 +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 02:57:12PM -0200, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: > > Add a devicetree documentation for the ad5933 and ad5934 impedance > > converter, network analyzer. > > > > Co-Developed-by: Gabriel Capella <gabriel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > checkpatch spits out: > > WARNING: Non-standard signature: Co-Developed-by: > > Co-developed-by Vs Co-Developed-by ? > > Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst: - Co-developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:12) When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-Developed-by: > > Confusing! Don't know which one is correct. I think neither one. What's the real purpose or value of it? There isn't one as far as I can tell. Just use Signed-off-by: Or maybe add multiple "Authored-by:" if anyone is all that concerned about authorship crediting... > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Capella <gabriel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Use `./scripts/get_maintainer.pl <your_patch>` to list the DT > maintainers and the relevant mailing list. > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
