From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Monday, November 26, 2018 11:21 AM
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> > index 0d6271cce198..8d97bd3a13a6 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> > @@ -109,6 +109,10 @@ void hyperv_vector_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> > void hv_setup_vmbus_irq(void (*handler)(void));
> > void hv_remove_vmbus_irq(void);
> >
> > +/* On x86/x64, there isn't a real IRQ to be enabled/disable */
> > +static inline void hv_enable_vmbus_irq(void) {}
> > +static inline void hv_disable_vmbus_irq(void) {}
> > +
> > void hv_setup_kexec_handler(void (*handler)(void));
> > void hv_remove_kexec_handler(void);
> > void hv_setup_crash_handler(void (*handler)(struct pt_regs *regs));
> > diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> > index 166c2501de17..d0bb09a4bd73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hv/hv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> > @@ -307,6 +307,7 @@ int hv_synic_init(unsigned int cpu)
> > hv_set_siefp(siefp.as_uint64);
> >
> > /* Setup the shared SINT. */
> > + hv_enable_vmbus_irq();
> > hv_get_synint_state(VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT, shared_sint.as_uint64);
> >
> > shared_sint.vector = HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR;
> > @@ -434,6 +435,7 @@ int hv_synic_cleanup(unsigned int cpu)
> > /* Disable the global synic bit */
> > sctrl.enable = 0;
> > hv_set_synic_state(sctrl.as_uint64);
> > + hv_disable_vmbus_irq();
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.19.1
>
> You created "null" hooks that do nothing, for no one in this patch
> series, why?
>
hv_enable_vmbus_irq() and hv_disable_vmbus_irq() have non-null
implementations in the ARM64 code in patch 2 of this series. The
implementations are in the new file arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c.
Or am I misunderstanding your point?
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
