On lis 23, 2018 21:51, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> Added a of_device_id struct variable and subsequent call to
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE macro to complete device-tree support for this
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> index edb8b540bbf1..19e8b6d2865c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> @@ -771,9 +771,18 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id ad5933_id[] = {
>
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ad5933_id);
>
> +static const struct of_device_id ad5933_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "analog-devices,ad5933" },
> + { .compatible = "analog-devices,ad5934" },
Why "analog-devices", rather than "adi"? My understanding is that analog devices
have "adi" as a manufacture part in compatible.
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ad5933_of_match);
> +
> static struct i2c_driver ad5933_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "ad5933",
> + .of_match_table = ad5933_of_match,
> },
> .probe = ad5933_probe,
> .remove = ad5933_remove,
--
Slawomir Stepien
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
