Hi,
thank you for the response.
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 16:05 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:23 PM Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Also, the header is x86 specific, while there are non-x86 OLPC
> > machines.
>
> Same concern. as per patch 2.
Which concern? If it's that it doesn't make sense in that particular
place in the patch set, then I don't think so; this header is
unnecessary and the patch has no other dependencies. But the changes
that enable the OLPC EC platform code depend on this.
> Also, you might want to sort headers in alphabetical order.
But should I? Doing so in the same commit would obscure the actual
change, and a separate commit would needlessly clobber git annotate.
Thank you
Lubo
> > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c
> > b/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c
> > index f99b183d5296..35a21c66cd0d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c
> > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > #include <linux/olpc-ec.h>
> > -#include <asm/olpc.h>
> >
> > struct ec_cmd_desc {
> > u8 cmd;
> > --
> > 2.19.0
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
