On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 22:03:54 +0530
Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:22:15PM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:44 +0530, Nishad Kamdar wrote:
> > > Use the gpiod interface instead of the deprecated old non-descriptor
> > > interface for ldac_pin.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> >
> > Hi Nishad,
> >
> > I have been working on implementing device tree bindings for this
> > driver and removing platform data from it.
> >
> > I've sent a series of patches for it to Jonathan. I didn't send it
> > on the mailing list as I wanted to confirm from Jonathan if we wants
> > something more to be done in the series. That series also includes
> > the change which you are proposing here.
> > I am really sorry that you didn't know about this.
> > If you are planning to send any other patches for this driver then
> > let me know before you start implementing it so that we can
> > co-ordinate before doing any work.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > > drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > > b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > > index 3f22d1088713..94f945ba0097 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
> > > */
> > >
> > > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> > > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > > #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > > #include <linux/device.h>
> > > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
> > >
> > > struct adt7316_chip_info {
> > > struct adt7316_bus bus;
> > > - u16 ldac_pin;
> > > + struct gpio_desc *ldac_pin;
> > > u16 int_mask; /* 0x2f */
> > > u8 config1;
> > > u8 config2;
> > > @@ -950,8 +950,8 @@ static ssize_t adt7316_store_update_DAC(struct
> > > device *dev,
> > > if (ret)
> > > return -EIO;
> > > } else {
> > > - gpio_set_value(chip->ldac_pin, 0);
> > > - gpio_set_value(chip->ldac_pin, 1);
> > > + gpiod_set_value(chip->ldac_pin, 0);
> > > + gpiod_set_value(chip->ldac_pin, 1);
> > > }
> > >
> > > return len;
> > > @@ -2120,7 +2120,14 @@ int adt7316_probe(struct device *dev, struct
> > > adt7316_bus *bus,
> > > else
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > - chip->ldac_pin = adt7316_platform_data[1];
> > > + chip->ldac_pin = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "ldac",
> > > GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(chip->ldac_pin)) {
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR(chip->ldac_pin);
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to request ldac GPIO: %d\n",
> > > + ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (chip->ldac_pin) {
> > > chip->config3 |= ADT7316_DA_EN_VIA_DAC_LDCA;
> > > if ((chip->id & ID_FAMILY_MASK) == ID_ADT75XX)
> Hello Shreeya,
>
> Sure no problem.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Nishad
Hi Nishad,
Thanks for being so understanding on this. I would normally operate
a policy of first to post on the list (assuming they update reasonably
quickly) is the on I apply, but as you are fine with it and this will
save Shreeya a little time (by avoiding a rebase) I'll wait for Shreeya's
public version.
I once discovered I was one of 3 people working on new drivers for a
single camera sensor years ago. All 3 got posted in the same week
despite the part having been around for years before that. Sometimes
we get unlucky - the nature of opensource ;)
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
