Hello Takashi, Mike, @Takashi On 10/25/18 09:37, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Well, in the API POV, it's nothing wrong to keep hwptr sticking while > updating only delay value. It implies that the hardware chip doesn't > provide the hwptr update. Thank you for the clarification. Modifying `runtime->delay` from the `pointer` function looked wrong for me. Now I understand the motivation and the use-case. I will be more careful when analyzing the code which doesn't fit my expectations. @Mike I was wrong. You can ignore my comments. Please don't take them personal: it's all about having high-quality code in kernel. Best Regards, Kirill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
