Hi Russell:
Thanks for your review.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 5:36 PM Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:27:34AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018, Liran Alon wrote:
> > > > > On 13 Oct 2018, at 17:53, lantianyu1986@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch is to add wrapper functions for tlb_remote_flush_with_range
> > > > > callback.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Change sicne V3:
> > > > > Remove code of updating "tlbs_dirty"
> > > > > Change since V2:
> > > > > Fix comment in the kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_range()
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > > > > index c73d9f650de7..ff656d85903a 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > > > > @@ -264,6 +264,46 @@ static void mmu_spte_set(u64 *sptep, u64 spte);
> > > > > static union kvm_mmu_page_role
> > > > > kvm_mmu_calc_root_page_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > > >
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline bool kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range(void)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return kvm_x86_ops->tlb_remote_flush_with_range;
> > > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > Seems that kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range() is not used in this patch…
> > >
> > > What's wrong with that?
> > >
> > > It provides the implementation and later patches make use of it. It's a
> > > sensible way to split patches into small, self contained entities.
> >
> > From what I can see of the patches that follow _this_ patch in the
> > series, this function remains unused. So, not only is it not used
> > in this patch, it's not used in this series.
>
> Note - I seem to have only received patches 1 through 4, so this is
> based on the patches I've received.
>
Sorry to confuse your. I get from CCers from get_maintainer.pl script.
The next patch "[PATCH V4 3/15]KVM: Replace old tlb flush function with
new one to flush a specified range" calls new function.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/13/254
The patch "[PATCH V4 4/15] KVM: Make kvm_set_spte_hva() return int"
changes under ARM directory. Please have a look. Thanks.
--
Best regards
Tianyu Lan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
