Retraction: in hindsight I see that with the current usage of this
function, there is already a check for the socket buffer so this check
is unnecessary. However, I'm not sure if it's considered good practice
to keep this check anyway--in any case, ENOMEM isn't the right error
to return.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Aymen Qader wrote:
> Add a null pointer check for the socket buffer in ks_hostif.c to avoid a
> possible null pointer deference, and remove a later now-redundant null
> pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aymen Qader <qader.aymen@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Remove redundant pointer check
> v3: Style fix
>
> drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> index 0e554e3359b5..95b6c7557e84 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> @@ -1011,6 +1011,11 @@ int hostif_data_request(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> size_t size;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!skb) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_kfree;
> + }
> +
> skb_len = skb->len;
> if (skb_len > ETH_FRAME_LEN) {
> netdev_err(priv->net_dev, "bad length skb_len=%d\n", skb_len);
> @@ -1023,7 +1028,6 @@ int hostif_data_request(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> priv->wpa.mic_failure.stop) {
> if (netif_queue_stopped(priv->net_dev))
> netif_wake_queue(priv->net_dev);
> - if (skb)
> dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
