Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] staging: erofs: option validation for remount and some code cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018/9/20 7:34, cgxu519 wrote:
> On 9/19/18 11:22 PM, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> Hi Chengguang,
>>
>> On 2018/9/19 22:53, Chengguang Xu wrote:
>>> Hi Greg, Xiang
>>>
>>> I rebased code on latest erofs-master branch and that branch
>>> has already merged the first patch in my previous patchset,
>>> so this time I only post rest 3 patches.
>> Great, at the most time Chao's erofs-master is the same as Greg's
>> staging tree (currently it is), but I personally think all patches
>> could be better directly based on the final staging tree if these
>> patches has no real/effective dependency with some submitted patches
>> but haven't been applied by Greg (p.s. it should be avoided as
>> much as possible because community guys could find something
>> important like the yesterday patches).
>>
>> Once again, the detail information of branches is described in
>>    https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linux-erofs/

Yeah, I can confirm that's all true. :)

>>
>> I have nothing more to say, good luck :)
>>
> Thanks for the guide!
> 
> Chengguang
> 
> .
> 

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux