Re: [PATCH 2/7] staging: erofs: code cleanup for option parsing of fault_injection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/14/2018 11:22 PM, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2018/9/13 13:46, cgxu519 wrote:
On 09/13/2018 10:15 AM, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2018/9/12 13:10, Chengguang Xu wrote:
Define a dummpy function of erofs_build_fault_attr() when macro
CONFIG_EROFS_FAULT_INJECTION is disabled, so that we don't have to
check the macro in calling place. Based on above adjustment,
do proper code cleanup for option parsing of fault_injection.

Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/staging/erofs/super.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/super.c b/drivers/staging/erofs/super.c
index 1aec509c805f..14dbb6517b8d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/erofs/super.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/super.c
@@ -144,18 +144,33 @@ char *erofs_fault_name[FAULT_MAX] = {
       [FAULT_KMALLOC]        = "kmalloc",
   };
   -static void erofs_build_fault_attr(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
-                        unsigned int rate)
+static int erofs_build_fault_attr(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
+                    substring_t *args)
   {
       struct erofs_fault_info *ffi = &sbi->fault_info;
+    int rate = 0;
+
+    if (args->from && match_int(args, &rate))
+        return -EINVAL;
         if (rate) {
           atomic_set(&ffi->inject_ops, 0);
           ffi->inject_rate = rate;
           ffi->inject_type = (1 << FAULT_MAX) - 1;
+        set_opt(sbi, FAULT_INJECTION);
       } else {
           memset(ffi, 0, sizeof(struct erofs_fault_info));
+        clear_opt(sbi, FAULT_INJECTION);
Hmmm, if user mounts/remounts image with -o fault_injection=0, user can not
check such info in anywhere, as we skip showing this option due to lack of
EROFS_MOUNT_FAULT_INJECTION bit. How about keeping this bit?

IIUC, the purpose of fault_injection=0 is for disabling fault injection function,
so isn't it the same as default? Should we distinguish explicit setting value 0
IMO, if user set fault_injection=0 during mount, it means user want to enable
this feature but currently user want to set the rate to zero, later user may
change it to non-zero. And with EROFS_MOUNT_FAULT_INJECTION being set, user can
check current rate value via ->show_options.

Hi Chao,

Do you mean user can modify the value without remount? or maybe in the future?

Thanks,
Chengguang






_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux