Rename the constant EEPROM_TxPwIndex_OFDM_24G_V1 to EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G_V1, this change clears the checkpatch issue with CamelCase naming. This is a coding style change which should have no impact on runtime code execution. Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c index 83a61fcab53b..7189249a898f 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c @@ -2517,12 +2517,12 @@ static int rtl8192_read_eeprom_info(struct net_device *dev) *((u16 *)(&priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelCCK_V1[1])) = tmpValue; if (bLoad_From_EEPOM) tmpValue = eprom_read(dev, - EEPROM_TxPwIndex_OFDM_24G_V1 >> 1); + EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G_V1 >> 1); else tmpValue = 0x1010; *((u16 *)(&priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[0])) = tmpValue; if (bLoad_From_EEPOM) - tmpValue = eprom_read(dev, (EEPROM_TxPwIndex_OFDM_24G_V1 + 2) >> 1); + tmpValue = eprom_read(dev, (EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G_V1 + 2) >> 1); else tmpValue = 0x10; priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelOFDM24G[2] = (u8)tmpValue; diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h index 437bb9212e47..4cf3a7fc705e 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ #define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK 0x23 //0x23 #define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_OFDM_24G 0x24 //0x24~0x26 #define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1 0x29 //0x29~0x2B -#define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_OFDM_24G_V1 0x2C //0x2C~0x2E +#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G_V1 0x2C //0x2C~0x2E #define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_Ver 0x27 //0x27 #define EEPROM_Default_ThermalMeter 0x7 -- 2.18.0 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
