On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 19:30:50 +0000
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Return a matching hv_vmbus_device_id pointer.
> > + * If there is no match, return NULL.
> > + */
> > +static const struct hv_vmbus_device_id *hv_vmbus_get_id(struct hv_driver *drv,
> > + struct hv_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + const uuid_le *guid = &dev->dev_type;
> > + const struct hv_vmbus_device_id *id;
> >
> > - return NULL;
> > + /* When driver_override is set, only bind to the matching driver */
> > + if (dev->driver_override && strcmp(dev->driver_override, drv->name))
> > + return NULL;
>
> This function needs to be covered by the device lock, so that
> dev->driver_override can't be set to NULL and the memory freed
> during the above 'if' statement. When called from vmbus_probe(),
> the device lock is held, so it's good. But when called from
> vmbus_match(), the device lock may not be held: consider the path
> __driver_attach() -> driver_match_device() -> vmbus_match().
The function hv_vmbus_get_id is called from that path.
i.e. __device_attach -> driver-match_device -> vmbus_match.
and __device_attach always does:
device_lock(dev);
The code in driver _override_store uses the same device_lock
when storing the new value.
This is same locking as is done in pci-sysfs.c
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
