On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:34:27AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:22 AM Ajay Singh <ajay.kathat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 23:20:33 +0200 > > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > The TODO item named "make spi and sdio components coexist in one > > > build" was apparently addressed a long time ago, but never removed > > > from the TODO file. However, the new patch that tries to address it > > > actually makes it worse again by duplicating the common parts of the > > > driver into two separate modules rather than sharing them. This also > > > introduces a build regression when one of the two is built-in while > > > the other is a loadable module: > > > > Thanks for sharing your inputs and submitting patch. > > I have also submitted a patch to address the compilation error[1]. > > We can ignore my patch and proceed with your changes. > > > > [1].https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10563873/ > > That patch seems useful regardless, as it removes dead code, > but I'd still prefer to revert the 9abc44ba4e2f ("staging: wilc1000: > fix TODO to compile spi and sdio components in single module") > commit for the other reasons I explained. I agree, I'll queue it up soon, I have other patches to get to Linus first. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
