On Sat, 4 Aug 2018, Sohil Ladhani wrote: > Fixed a coding style issue This seems to fix the header problem. But it is a patch on the same code at the same place doing the same thing as the previous message. So you should say [PATCH v2] in the subject line, and then below the --- explain what has changed as compared to the previous submission. julia > > Signed-off-by: Sohil Ladhani <supertakumi86@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/rtlwifi/base.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/base.c b/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/base.c > index 094827c1879a..654aa4e068ba 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/base.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/base.c > @@ -685,9 +685,8 @@ static void _rtl_query_protection_mode(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, > } > } > > -u8 rtl_mrate_idx_to_arfr_id( > - struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 rate_index, > - enum wireless_mode wirelessmode) > +u8 rtl_mrate_idx_to_arfr_id(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 rate_index, > + enum wireless_mode wirelessmode) > { > struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw); > struct rtl_phy *rtlphy = &rtlpriv->phy; > -- > 2.18.0 > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel